Wow, no kidding, very interesting. I’m a fan of increased dynamic range! Smartphones are where the big volumes are... Adapting it for drones? Hmmmmm. Buying a sensor made in these volumes would make them cheaper. I’ll wait on another purchase until everyone’s chimed-in since I have plenty of XSP stuff that works well.
I read a long article in response to someone critiquing Apple’s stubbornness in sticking with a 12mp iPhone camera sensor in even it’s $$$ X model. Yet, iPhones regularly are ranked near the top in image quality. The answer reminded me of what NASA said about the Mars Rover 2MP cameras.
12MP is plenty if everything else top-notch (EVO?). A decent sensor is just a 1/3 of the equation — at best. Optics are key. Processing is a complex, multifaceted beast. It’s the custom code written to enhance with the RAW image sensor output, working in concert with the image processor. Kind/type of compression and efficient workflow? Maintaining high quality can slow processing (Nikon D800). Getting it all to work together as a harmonious system that maximizes what the individual components are capable of — to perform a given device’s misssion, (a drone, a phone, a rover) isn’t easy. Apple said in 2015, 800 employees work on the iPhone camera exclusively. Apple is finally moving to another sensor next year — likely a Sony since they dominate this market. I wonder if it’s this one?