Split or graduated ND filters for Evo II?
- Thread starter ZGhobo
- Start date
Not needed..... @kenautelevo2pro provided a much better solution as well. Any filter you use at the time of capture is burned into the image forever, much better to do it in post if desired.
Thank you both for your input. I should have clarified that I have video in mind, not so much photography. The mountain scenes here in the Rockies have such a wide dynamic range, from dark valley bottoms to intense sunset sky, that trying to recover/enhance data in post just isn't going to yield a quality result (especially with video). Believe me, I've tried.
The dynamic range of the Autel sensors just doesn't cover the dynamic range that mother nature offers up. Having the ability to knock the sky down a stop or two starts to shift the odds in my favor.
Not at all worried about having a file that is permanently altered by a grad filter. It's actually what I'm looking for. Not interested in dropping in a fake sky into video when an amazing sky already exists. I'm just challenged (in a good way) to get it!
The dynamic range of the Autel sensors just doesn't cover the dynamic range that mother nature offers up. Having the ability to knock the sky down a stop or two starts to shift the odds in my favor.
Not at all worried about having a file that is permanently altered by a grad filter. It's actually what I'm looking for. Not interested in dropping in a fake sky into video when an amazing sky already exists. I'm just challenged (in a good way) to get it!
Similar threads
