- Joined
- Nov 11, 2021
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 50
- Age
- 56
Hi there,
Did anyone already notice this, too? (Most likely a "Dual 640T"-only-problem due to its two cameras)
Yesterday I flew a mapping mission planned as PPK due to possibly bad network connection on site.
When using Emlid Studio v1.3 for PPK-processing, I got a message pointing to an error that the number of photos does not match the number of timestamps in the .mrk-file.
Checking the respective Timestamp.mrk-file I noticed that there were doublettes for almost every image number, having different GPS "taken-at" times and positions.
By comparing the images' GPS locations from the MAX-camera (RGB) and the IRX-camera (IR) with the Timestamp.mrk-file entries, I realized that the first doubled number line was for the IRX-camera and the second for the MAX-camera.
If there was only one line (no image doublette) it was for the IRX-camera.
In order to get only timestamps for the MAX-camera (RGB), I manually edited the Timestamp.mrk-file by deleting all single number lines or only keeping the second line from the doubled numbers.
It was not very handy and can produce some "human errors".
This flaw is due to the "well intended" change of always taking two images (instead of one) even if IR or RGB only is selected. This came with FW 2.3.23.
Is it the same with the EVO2 RTK Dual 640T (not Enterprise) version?
Did anyone already notice this, too? (Most likely a "Dual 640T"-only-problem due to its two cameras)
Yesterday I flew a mapping mission planned as PPK due to possibly bad network connection on site.
When using Emlid Studio v1.3 for PPK-processing, I got a message pointing to an error that the number of photos does not match the number of timestamps in the .mrk-file.
Checking the respective Timestamp.mrk-file I noticed that there were doublettes for almost every image number, having different GPS "taken-at" times and positions.
By comparing the images' GPS locations from the MAX-camera (RGB) and the IRX-camera (IR) with the Timestamp.mrk-file entries, I realized that the first doubled number line was for the IRX-camera and the second for the MAX-camera.
If there was only one line (no image doublette) it was for the IRX-camera.
In order to get only timestamps for the MAX-camera (RGB), I manually edited the Timestamp.mrk-file by deleting all single number lines or only keeping the second line from the doubled numbers.
It was not very handy and can produce some "human errors".
This flaw is due to the "well intended" change of always taking two images (instead of one) even if IR or RGB only is selected. This came with FW 2.3.23.
Is it the same with the EVO2 RTK Dual 640T (not Enterprise) version?