Good point.
I’d really like an explanation about the technical reasons why EVO 1 cannot currently handle the various mission planning / waypoint capabilities a) that it previously had, and b) that the
EVO II has, such as forward overlap (and a properly working side overlap which changes with height), and also the ability to take photos after a selected distance of travel, rather than a time frequency.
Point of Interest would also be nice, but it’s not at the top of my list.
If it’s simply about withholding various mission planning / waypoint features which the EVO 1 is in fact capable of, just in the hopes that some people will buy the
EVO II, then they’ve lost a future customer. I truly hope this isn’t the case.
I’ll fully understand if there’s valid technical reasons why certain mission planning / waypoint features cannot be implemented, as long as there’s an explanation which does not insult our intelligence. I just find their apparent unwillingness to respond to, or even acknowledge questions on their YouTube channel, or even their website, rather disappointing.
I’m hoping that the EVO 1 will get some love and attention once the
EVO II mission planning and waypoint features are stable, and I understand it’s the flagship and will understandably take up a lot of the company’s time and energy.
I just hope they can find the time to elevate the EVO 1 to what we all think it can be.