Raw photos?

JANGER · Feb 20, 2020

Anyone can share raw photoshots from EVO II ?

butch · Feb 20, 2020

JANGER said:
Anyone can share raw photoshots from EVO II ?

No one has the Evo 2 yet, they are not ready on the free market yet. Only demo videos available. Of course I could be wrong, if so chime in anyone.

Jagerbomb52 · Feb 20, 2020

Ya best bet would be to find all the Youtubers that have one to review and make a post on their Youtube page asking for Raw photos. You might get lucky and have one of them help you out.

lukappaseidue · Feb 20, 2020

Agustine said:
Ya best bet would be to find all the Youtubers that have one to review and make a post on their Youtube page asking for Raw photos. You might get lucky and have one of them help you out.

no luck

I asked every youtubers for raw photos, but no answer
only raw videos

JANGER · Feb 21, 2020

is it strange?

lukappaseidue said:
no luck
I asked every youtubers for raw photos, but no answer
only raw videos

Philipandrews · Feb 21, 2020

I've been a XSP owner and am hoping to upgrade to the Evo 2. Does anyone know if the Evo 2's DNG/RAW files include the exif data? The XSP's DNG files did not include the exif data so if you were trying to merge an HDR image via lightroom you had to merge the exif data over via a terminal script which was very time consuming.

jesmo5 · Feb 24, 2020

Here you go. This guy posted video and photos from the EVO II

Philipandrews · Feb 25, 2020

jesmo5 said:
Here you go. This guy posted video and photos from the EVO II

This is linking to the same page

jesmo5 · Feb 25, 2020

Not sure what happened. THIS is the link where you can download the raw photos.

jesmo5 · Feb 25, 2020

JANGER said:
Anyone can share raw photoshots from EVO II ?

Tom's Tech Time uploaded video and raw photos that can be downloaded, and brought into lightroom to see the quality.

Northwood Mediaworks · Feb 26, 2020

jesmo5 said:
Tom's Tech Time uploaded video and raw photos that can be downloaded, and brought into lightroom to see the quality.

So what are your impressions?

jesmo5 · Feb 27, 2020

Northwood Mediaworks said:
So what are your impressions?

I'm encouraged, but not sure about the actual quality, because the photos he took 1) were of a snowy area around a bridge, and other areas made up of mostly snow, so the amount of color details to study is minimal. Something in a space with a lot more color, and lots of objects to inspect would have been much more helpful. 2) He took these photos in low light scenarios (probably very early in the morning, or late in the evening), so the exposure has to be brought up, which introduces some noise. 3) The images he shot were all shot with the f/1.8 lens, so of course that limits the fidelity of the image quality.

All that being said, there seems to be pretty good dynamic range in the raw images overall. My overall impression is that it is good, and the 48 megapixel photos is a definite improvement on anything we've seen from DJI, or Autel. I'm just unsure of how good it is due to the lack of color and recognizable details in the photos. All the video I've seen looks fantastic, so at this point, I'm really more interested in the quality of the photography.

What will truly be the test is with the "Pro" version of the camera with adjustable aperture. That will be the real game changer.

easyheimer · Feb 27, 2020

jesmo5 said:
I'm encouraged, but not sure about the actual quality, because the photos he took 1) were of a snowy area around a bridge, and other areas made up of mostly snow, so the amount of color details to study is minimal. Something in a space with a lot more color, and lots of objects to inspect would have been much more helpful. 2) He took these photos in low light scenarios (probably very early in the morning, or late in the evening), so the exposure has to be brought up, which introduces some noise. 3) The images he shot were all shot with the f/1.8 lens, so of course that limits the fidelity of the image quality.

All that being said, there seems to be pretty good dynamic range in the raw images overall. My overall impression is that it is good, and the 48 megapixel photos is a definite improvement on anything we've seen from DJI, or Autel. I'm just unsure of how good it is due to the lack of color and recognizable details in the photos. All the video I've seen looks fantastic, so at this point, I'm really more interested in the quality of the photography.

What will truly be the test is with the "Pro" version of the camera with adjustable aperture. That will be the real game changer.

This is encouraging.

atortaloha · Mar 24, 2021

jesmo5 said:
I'm encouraged, but not sure about the actual quality, because the photos he took 1) were of a snowy area around a bridge, and other areas made up of mostly snow, so the amount of color details to study is minimal. Something in a space with a lot more color, and lots of objects to inspect would have been much more helpful. 2) He took these photos in low light scenarios (probably very early in the morning, or late in the evening), so the exposure has to be brought up, which introduces some noise. 3) The images he shot were all shot with the f/1.8 lens, so of course that limits the fidelity of the image quality.

All that being said, there seems to be pretty good dynamic range in the raw images overall. My overall impression is that it is good, and the 48 megapixel photos is a definite improvement on anything we've seen from DJI, or Autel. I'm just unsure of how good it is due to the lack of color and recognizable details in the photos. All the video I've seen looks fantastic, so at this point, I'm really more interested in the quality of the photography.

What will truly be the test is with the "Pro" version of the camera with adjustable aperture. That will be the real game changer.

I agree tough to tell with those images. I want to see some from the 6K and can't find raw sample files for that either.