Rule of thumb... shutter speed should be 2x frame rate. Frame rate is the # of pictures taken per second, shutter speed is the amount of exposure time per picture.
The slower the framerate, the more info/data the sensor can gather, hence the better the image quality, since there is more info. Framerate goes hand in hand with shutter speed. Remember that.
Comparing the same scene shot at 30 vs 60 will more than likely look slightly better at 30. But...I think you will need to look really close to find the difference. Your shutter speed MUST be faster than your frame rate otherwise you get blank frames and duplicate frames in your final video. You may notice a slight "stutter" in the video at 30 vs 60, but the advantage of 30 is higher quality and motion blur. The advantage of 60 is you end up with more to work with in post as long as you keep the shutter speed higher than the frame rate. Optimally at 2x.
Here is another thing to think about...ND filters that slow shutter speed by limiting the amount of light to the sensor. You can shoot two videos in sunlight..both at 30fps, one video without an ND filter the other with, slowing the shutter speed to 2x frame rate with the correct ND filter. The video with the ND filter will look way, WAY better, way more saturated than the video shot on auto shutter. Longer exposure time for each frame with the ND filter, means more info to the sensor, better quality.
I am not a video expert, but did shoot video commercially for many years - mostly theater work, along with being a semi-pro fotog. Drone footage usually yaws a lot, so at the lower framerate, you need to be really slow when yawing to keep it sharp. There is math involved to determine the rate of yaw to keep things smooth, and I am lazy when I fly, so I like the higher framerate of 60. Is it "better"? Depends on your preference and what you are shooting, and what your definition of "better" is. Hope this info helps someone, and if I am not accurate in any statements, feel free to correct. Not here to argue any points.
The slower the framerate, the more info/data the sensor can gather, hence the better the image quality, since there is more info. Framerate goes hand in hand with shutter speed. Remember that.
Comparing the same scene shot at 30 vs 60 will more than likely look slightly better at 30. But...I think you will need to look really close to find the difference. Your shutter speed MUST be faster than your frame rate otherwise you get blank frames and duplicate frames in your final video. You may notice a slight "stutter" in the video at 30 vs 60, but the advantage of 30 is higher quality and motion blur. The advantage of 60 is you end up with more to work with in post as long as you keep the shutter speed higher than the frame rate. Optimally at 2x.
Here is another thing to think about...ND filters that slow shutter speed by limiting the amount of light to the sensor. You can shoot two videos in sunlight..both at 30fps, one video without an ND filter the other with, slowing the shutter speed to 2x frame rate with the correct ND filter. The video with the ND filter will look way, WAY better, way more saturated than the video shot on auto shutter. Longer exposure time for each frame with the ND filter, means more info to the sensor, better quality.
I am not a video expert, but did shoot video commercially for many years - mostly theater work, along with being a semi-pro fotog. Drone footage usually yaws a lot, so at the lower framerate, you need to be really slow when yawing to keep it sharp. There is math involved to determine the rate of yaw to keep things smooth, and I am lazy when I fly, so I like the higher framerate of 60. Is it "better"? Depends on your preference and what you are shooting, and what your definition of "better" is. Hope this info helps someone, and if I am not accurate in any statements, feel free to correct. Not here to argue any points.