I agree with you. I noticed the same thing.That looked like user error as much as anything. He started the orbit at the left edge of the frame. If he had started centered, it probably would have stayed centered.
My XSP orbit works fine, provided it’s set up correctly. This guy didn’t set up correctly.
I’ll post it up, give me a bit to find it, but it’s not butter smooth. But it does an outstanding job of keeping the subject in frame.If you have a XSP with a orbit that works fine then please provide a video I would love to see a smooth orbit from the XSP.
No nothing is perfect but when you are trying to make a buck or two from the camera platform you just spent a $1000 bucks on and your client tells you your orbits suck big time its time to move on to the dark side LOL trust me my friend on here did and his orbits are pretty much perfect now. Autel keeps missing the boat, the X-Star was a very good flying machine, just needed a few tweeks to keep it going. They went with the EVO, more problems out of the gate. Some have been solved and others have been removed from their web site. Ask them about mapping and they will tell you that was never on the table, I say bull as there are videos still floating around saying mapping is a option. Hard to trust this company, yes they make solid UAV's and the support is rated #1 but big deal if they cannot deliver what they have promised.
My point exactly. My daddy told me"Don't believe all that sales crap son there just trying to get your money!'Early adopters are, unfortunately, the guina pigs of today’s hi tech world. Not saying your friend is, but just sayin.
I had been looking at the XSP since it came out, did my research as best I could, and haunted this board before becoming a member. I knew before hand what I was getting into because I took my time. I didn’t need a new drone, I simply wanted one.
People seem to want everything NOW and then complain that it doesn’t work right when they get it. Well, when a manufacturer sees that customers are chomping at the bit, corners are cut to get the product on the shelfs NOW. Therein lies the problem.
Case in point: I work in the aerospace industry. We make large assemblies for Boeing. They scream, we go faster, but with compromise. Management pushes. Inspection (me) balks at the defects. Guess what? Product ships no matter what. Why? Because Boeing’s customers are screaming at them. Subsequently, I no longer fly. At all.
I’m sure that the evo will eventually shine, but it takes time, and that’s something people don’t seem to want to give.
I do agree with the mapping issue, they did advertise it having the capability to do so. I remember the video you are talking about. But they didn’t deliver.
I do believe it is their right to pull advertised features off the table, but the way they handled it was chicken s**t.
Remember, Autel Robotics may be based in the US, but they are owned by Autel Intelligent Technology in China. Designed in China. Made in China. The face we see and deal with is on the US side, a buffer if you will, and the US side has no control over what goes on, what’s implemented, what’s been deleted.
They answer to China, the same folks who are counterfitting all the good stuff. I’m sure the US side would be more than happy to make us happy and repeat customers, but China has the final say so. Too bad we (US) can’t compete with them.
Sorry about the rant. It’s just that folks need to realize big companies don’t give a hoot about the current customer, just about getting the NEXT customer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.