andrew124C41
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2022
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 31
- Age
- 72
Lithium ion batteries for RC aircraft if managed appropriately, offer far more than 50 cycles. They are meant to be used... Charged and discharged by use. Horizon Hobby now makes a smart battery which is more expensive than the regular lithium ion ones. However, they are nowhere near as expensive as what Autel is charging.While I understand the “practicality“ of avoiding flying over any bodies of water after 50 cycles on a battery. But then we’re talking about batteries that are $219 each MSRP and I would have no problems doing that if said batteries which are rated for at least 200 or more cycles(by the manufacturer themselves) within lower the price by 75% and should they make that recommendation of not flying over water after 50 cycles then I certainly wouldn’t/couldn’t argue with that.
Even sidestepping the “practicality“ approach to this dilemma, the manufacturers responsibility in just about every state of the United States (I have no idea about other countries) does require appropriate diligence on their side just as it requires diligence on the consumer side. (Consumer rights).
So in this thread where some of the initial responses questioned the wisdom (practicality?) Flying over any body of water, frankly since we are responsible for our aircraft as pilots in charge whether it be over a body of water, buildings, or other potentially sensitive infrastructure, people, etc. do we then limit flights over ANYTHING after 50 charges? In order to prevent potential damage to the craft as well as to the persons and/or structures on the ground? This is some thing that’s not hypothetical but it’s quite existential.
So if one applies that logic, with all due respect, then we shouldn’t be flying these craft with anything over 50 cycles. But then what is the remedy should this occur after 35 cycles, or in my case at 30 cycles?!
Again I appreciate what Autel has done to try to help when push came to shove, and offering reduced prices on replacement craft and accessories, I still shelled out any thousands of dollars and of course that was my choice and my choice alone. But I wonder about the myriad of other possibilities and problems despite safe and appropriate drone flying, that even win a conscientious and fully compliant 107 certified pilot performs yet these problems still exist and that does impart significant manufacturer responsibility. There is a mutual responsibility at hand from pilot and control to manufacturer, thus if “50 cycles“ is the recommendation of proceeds I realize it is not per the manufacturer) then this disconnect remains a problem.
If they were smart, they would figure out a way to change to lithium iron phosphate... The nominal voltage is lower but I would imagine it is something they could do.
How often is this problem occuring.