Dave Pitman
Well-Known Member
Sure, I get that, what I'm saying is that it only has an Icon in DJI drones with this feature, and no info... I'm not dissagreeing with you, I'm just being pragmatic.
At some point this tech may evolve into more real and practical aircraft, but now, while things are evolving, I'm not surprised nor hampered by how things are.
Letting me know that an aircraft is within range of the reciever is a start. I can drop altitude, return to home and pay more attention to my surroundings. Flying at 400' max it's not hard to get down quickly, and look up, and at this point that's good enough...
With mandatory line of site and such a low flight ceiling, the requirements for the professional level of data you mention seems like it might be beyond the scope of what's going to be given priority.
I think you said it best: "Actual ADS-B recievers in aircraft".
Hal, I think you misunderstand a little bit. Autel does not have to invent the wheel here. ADSB broadcasts all that info right now. Autel has to do nothing except compare the coordinate of the aircraft to your position, which it is doing all ready. And then pass on the other metrics via a text on the pop-up. There is no other "evolution" in the technology that needs to happen other than they would have to compare the coordinate to your position to determine which direction to look in my example. Autel software dudes just need to pass through the data all ready available to their app.
Have you ever had a look at Flightradar24.com (or their app) ? That is the data that is available to anyone with any kind of ADSB receiver. Having it displayed real pretty with pictures and graphics takes more work. But passing on the text of the data, not so much.
I don't have a DJI craft that has ADSB-in, but if it is that poor too, there in no real need to compare to it, really, IMO.
If they (Autel or DJI) advertise "ADS-B IN alerts" then I think they should relay all the info that the FAA has put into the broadcasts. Not just "there is a plane somewhere in your area" type of message. The reason I say it is probably worse than nothing is that if you get that message 100 times and you never see an aircraft any of those times, you will not see the message the 101st time and that's the one maybe you needed to see. "more data" is not the same as "good data". It's not my intent to argue or put down yours or other's opinions. If you are happy with "aircraft approaching" when all of the other data is so redily available at no extra cost and minimal effort, that's okay too. I, personally, am not too impressed.