Recent content by DaCurcO

And there it is folks , no haters here the nano+ has undisclosed bug , I flown my Lite+ with no issues , however the nano+ can’t say the same . As more drop please DM me for any class action suit as Autel has drop then ball big time with not recalling a faulty product.

Only if the Autel R&D had a brain with eyes and ears to see what should be done ..... 9 months later and only crickets ....

Y Yep agreed , with Lipo batteries will become less reliable when voltage is at >20% as at that level (capacity) the voltage needed to keep flying can drop and causes a stabilities problems and worst lead to crash, as an example; scenarios like a gusts winds in a hot or very cold day, where...

That sucks Mastix, its sound so typical for the Nano +, sorry to here that it crashed, however the bug that you describe, has happen to me and other people too, and IMO just don't think Autel as any understanding to the root cause, which in the end could be come a class action law suit against...

Agreed still feels like the Nano+ is in Beta in many aspects of the software stack. Its a low as Autel IMO has the tech to compete with DJI , just no the recipe for success in the Robotic Air market. - No Active Track - No KeyFrame flight mode - Poor Wind resistance - RTH fails when it...

Yeah believe what you want, I know what I saw with mine , it has the battle marks of the event, and as I stated I've flown 3hr afterwards with newer FW and its been fine. Any how no haters just facts !

The flight was done with a fresh battery and it dropped before I could leave my yard, with less than 2 min in the air and was at 10ft in Loiter, it was over 90% charge when this happened. The stats are from the this forum and also techradar who reported the same thing, there another post with...

Mine did the loss of of power with a fresh 100% battery charge, and I was just launching and going to do a flight around the yard, it was not in RTH, and just fell within the first min of flying. IMO just too many Nano+ drooping for no reason this is a pattern a not a one off. I won't be flying...

Just updating all, the RTH has another bug, it will fail to return if drone encounters certain types of obstacles (a big tree, or a group of them). The software stack, does not have any solution to go around or above, and just cancels the RTH, lol.

FYI .... make sure all devices have full battery (Drone, Controller, Cell/Tablet) for some reason it checks all, and it has a tendency to fail (with a probability to brick it self) if the Controller or Drone have less than 75%. For me, the only one that has worked from the start is the manual...

I suggest the Lite+ if you got the cash , I fly that quad with no problem and really love the night mode. Or like say wait till this problem is actually by Autel, best of luck

Yep both do the same for me too, the RTH logic keeps the desired Return Altitude parameter as a static value, hence its a software fix , hopefully it will get address in the next FW release.

Same thought here, I currently have the Nano+ grounded till I hear from Autel that its RESOVLED. However the Lite+ that I also fly has never displayed this issue/bug . Hope its just with the Nano+ @Blade Strike

IMO the Nano+ is better tech in most aspects, its camera still is better, Obj detection sensors, however unrefined in the sense of Hardware (battery, heat management and Software Development (dynamic tracking, automatic camera modes just 4) so if you buy for tech Nano+, if you buy for...

The point is really the BIG Lie of DJI , its not encrypted (encoded) this is where the problem is , first as some who works in the Tech industry, building hardware devices, this is a typical oversight of poor oversight in design. Basic step and 101 in the Development, is to choose a...