Recent content by Jasono

I guess to each his own. We fly where the internet isn't available.

Hello, I went through unbelievable amount of frustration before finding a solution to a similar problem I had. If you have a base station it makes absolutely no sense to send anything over the internet. But everyone and everything pushes that. not I do not use Trimble for a base I use...

An interesting development. Today a went to a location and did a double grid mission. Again no GCP's and this time my accuracy was excellent. I surveyed the location in 42 points and compared the Rover elevations with the drone elevations at the same point. There was an average difference of .1...

So you use GCPs with an rtk unit?

No im not. I use GCPs with my other 2 drones and have built 100's of models and orthophotos. This is an issue unique to this drone whil using RTK My accuracy is better vertically by using GPS and the models do not have this problem.

Yes they are all in FIX RTK and no there is no changes in source during flight I also used my rover with the exact same source to verify elevations. I've contacted autel support also and they are looking into it. Now for the PPK question i have not and im not understanding the workflow for...

Both those things are true. After a mapping mission when i process the images in ODM the farther away from the takeoff point i get the higher the elevations are. This is also true in the exif data embedded in the images before processing. The images are in wgs84 elipsoidal. My understanding...

I performed some more diagnostics. I connected to polaris online for rtk corrections to ensure my base wasn't and isse and i found the exact same behavior.

Are you referring to pix4d mapper?

Hello everyone, I have an evo II pro RTK v3 I am using a custom base station with NTRIP caster by ublox. I used my rover to survey varius point along a block such as in street, on curb, in gutter et... Now when i fly my autel evo II (Which i just purchased i see a bowl effect from the take...