Recent content by airheadbit

What no one is addressing is the wanton idiocy of a 'Module per Drone', every drone must have it's own module registered to ONLY that drone! I can only fly one drone at a time, the point of RID is to identify a drone to it's owner so why can't one RID module be used on each 'flying' drone...

While using my Autel Lite+ the Ultrasound sensor give an accurate reading, to bad they consider the Lite and Nano as not worthy their waypoint & SDK software, seems you have to spend $2500 or more to be privileged by them, marketing, got to hate them.

I removed all my Youtube video, not going to explain what appears to be a 4,000 foot AGL view when flying on the top of a mountain looking over a valley, or a run up a stream which is beyond 4,000 (VLS) without showing the spotters posted along the route. It would be a good thing if someone...

On June 28th this was listed at : UAS Declaration of Compliance Autel Robotics Model: EVO Nano FCC Identifier: 2AGNTMDA2409A I can live with that rather than the over-heating DJI Mini 3

@BlairAir Were you flying with the stock Nano/Lite/Lite+ controller and your phone (Apple or Android)? I agree, the stock RC controllers battery doesn't last long.

I was looking at the Nano to replace my DJI Mini 2 since I fly part 107 I'll need RID but Autel will not support RID on the Nano, they updated my Lite+ to support RID so for that I'm grateful. I still may get the Nano+ and add one of my Dronetag BS modules, the Autel Nano+ can handle the heat, I...

If you add a module to most sub-250g drones it will make it a Part 107 drone since: 249g+16g = 265g FAA OOP (Operations over people) is nuts, if I add my prop protectors to my Mavic mini 2 to enable me to fly over people it moves the drone out of category 1 since the drone now weighs more than...

Autel responded: From: Autel Support <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 21:56 To: me Subject: Lite+ and RID Dear Kevin, Thank you for raising your concerns. We are sorry to inform you that it is not possible to add a remote ID on the Nano+. According to the FAA UAV...

"Maybe much longer in more rural areas." Why? I already have to drive 6 hours to take the 'test' for part 107 thanks to the FAA big brother network.

"I'm unaware of the plans for manufacturers to develop anything." Anything built must be 'certified' by the FCC then the FAA, you're talking about deep pockets and a year at the least. "250 solution" At $1,500 a violation because the FAA interpreted a flight as NOT Recreational would you...

In the US, if your drone weighs less than 0.55 lb (250 g), registration is not required. This also means that your drone doesn't need a remote ID (RID). If you fly anything the FCC wants control. The "NEW" AC 91-57C explains Community Based Organizations (CBO) for Recreational Flyers but the...

I just updated my EVO Lite + and have working Remote ID, I checked the FAA website and found the Lite + listed but I could not find the Autel Nano + listed.

While getting my EVO Lite+ ready for spring flying, firmware and app updates, I didn't see any 'waypoints' in the latest android app 1.4.54 - I can only hope they have finally fixed the gimbal issues...

No issues with Galaxy Note 8, Note 10+, Tablet S4, Tripltek 8" - when the RC is plugged in and turned on the app starts and connects. I always put what ever into airplane mode before flying.

Bite the bullet and get the 8" Tripltek with LifThor Mjolnir Combo Tablet Holder for Autel Nano and Lite. I tried four different mounts and found the LifThor was the only one I trusted, rock solid. I almost returned the Tripltek, from the manufacture they load the 'kitchen-sink' and the flight...